Disgusted with obama administration - Part II

Home Archive Politics Disgusted with obama administration - Part II
R

rydawg5

Senior Member

2,639 posts
Aug 7, 2015 9:41 PM
Its going to be a hard pill to swallow when the history books looks at Obama very favorably.
Aug 7, 2015 9:41pm
Spock's avatar

Spock

Senior Member

2,853 posts
Aug 7, 2015 9:44 PM
rydawg5;1745012 wrote:Its going to be a hard pill to swallow when the history books looks at Obama very favorably.
not a chance
Aug 7, 2015 9:44pm
R

rydawg5

Senior Member

2,639 posts
Aug 7, 2015 9:45 PM
Definitely will.
Aug 7, 2015 9:45pm
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Aug 17, 2015 11:55 AM
In an opinion essay for the Orange County (CA) Register (8/16), Tom Campbell, dean of the law school and an economics professor at Chapman University, writes that six years into the recovery from the Great Recession, there’s a growing disconnect between what American workers are paid and their productivity, which now “has hit a wall.” He adds, “At the same time, the cost of complying with federal regulations has burgeoned.” Campbell cites a NAM study from 2014 of “the regulatory burden on U.S. industry in 2012.” It found that, with adjustments for inflation, the compliance cost for regulations rose an “astounding” 68% over four years, to $19,564 per employee from $11,638. “There has been a regulatory avalanche” under the Obama administration, and it has affected productivity, writes Campbell, who chides the White House Council of Economic Advisers for not embracing “the suggestion most likely to help employment and compensation” — reducing the costs on employers imposed “by the burgeoning federal regulatory environment.”
Aug 17, 2015 11:55am
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
Aug 21, 2015 2:44 PM
Sigh, I love when lay people try and understand the IAEA.....
All of this is flat wrong.

http://thehill.com/opinion/op-ed/251660-no-iran-is-not-allowed-to-inspect-itself

http://www.vox.com/2015/8/20/9182185/ap-iran-inspections-parchin
http://www.vox.com/2015/8/21/9187457/iran-iaea-agreement-text
Aug 21, 2015 2:44pm
fish82's avatar

fish82

Senior Member

4,111 posts
Aug 21, 2015 3:17 PM
rydawg5;1745014 wrote:Definitely will.
Agreed. I think CC forgets who writes the history books.
Aug 21, 2015 3:17pm
S

superman

Senior Member

3,582 posts
Aug 21, 2015 4:46 PM
You just cited vox as a resource.

Why not just cite Iran's official web page?
Aug 21, 2015 4:46pm
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
Aug 21, 2015 4:53 PM
superman;1746655 wrote:You just cited vox as a resource.

Why not just cite Iran's official web page?
How about refuting what is in the stories?
Amazing how little people actually know about the process of the IAEA.
Aug 21, 2015 4:53pm
Spock's avatar

Spock

Senior Member

2,853 posts
Aug 21, 2015 5:30 PM
ptown_trojans_1;1746657 wrote:How about refuting what is in the stories?
Amazing how little people actually know about the process of the IAEA.
sais the guy who voted for Obama on his foreign policy resume.
Aug 21, 2015 5:30pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Aug 21, 2015 5:33 PM
Just like Obamacare wasn't a tax and everyone could keep their plans, right?
Aug 21, 2015 5:33pm
S

superman

Senior Member

3,582 posts
Aug 21, 2015 6:06 PM
ptown_trojans_1;1746657 wrote:How about refuting what is in the stories?
Amazing how little people actually know about the process of the IAEA.
I refuse to give vox clicks so I didn't read the propaganda pieces.
Aug 21, 2015 6:06pm
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
Aug 21, 2015 7:08 PM
Spock;1746662 wrote:sais the guy who voted for Obama on his foreign policy resume.
like_that;1746663 wrote:Just like Obamacare wasn't a tax and everyone could keep their plans, right?
superman;1746665 wrote:I refuse to give vox clicks so I didn't read the propaganda pieces.
Sooooo no. How typical.
Ok, even though the IAEA refuted the AP story and the link on Fox News?
Whatever.
You guys have no clue on the topic. None.
Aug 21, 2015 7:08pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Aug 21, 2015 7:19 PM
ptown_trojans_1;1746669 wrote:Sooooo no. How typical.
Ok, even though the IAEA refuted the AP story and the link on Fox News?
Whatever.
You guys have no clue on the topic. None.
LOL, typical smug response form ptown. I read it. Sorry, I am not sorry I have a hard time trusting this current administration at this point (which is another reason why I won't be voting for hillary... it would be nice to actually trust our leaders for once). Especially from a libtard source like vox. If you are allowed to dimiss any source you deem conservative, i think its fair for anyone else do the same with liberal sources. Unlike you, I am not this administration's personal cheerleader. I haven't completely dissed or supported this deal. This is something that time will only tell (/con_alma) if it was a good deal or not. From what I have read from both sides of the news, my guess it is not a good deal and Obama gets bitch slapped in foreign affairs again. Anyway, please don't let us get in the way of your high horse. We wouldn't want to stop your 24/7 job of defending any and all liberal policy.
Aug 21, 2015 7:19pm
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
Aug 22, 2015 10:52 AM
like_that;1746672 wrote:LOL, typical smug response form ptown. I read it. Sorry, I am not sorry I have a hard time trusting this current administration at this point (which is another reason why I won't be voting for hillary... it would be nice to actually trust our leaders for once). Especially from a libtard source like vox. If you are allowed to dimiss any source you deem conservative, i think its fair for anyone else do the same with liberal sources. Unlike you, I am not this administration's personal cheerleader. I haven't completely dissed or supported this deal. This is something that time will only tell (/con_alma) if it was a good deal or not. From what I have read from both sides of the news, my guess it is not a good deal and Obama gets bitch slapped in foreign affairs again. Anyway, please don't let us get in the way of your high horse. We wouldn't want to stop your 24/7 job of defending any and all liberal policy.
If I am smug because I cannot stand the amount of stupidity surrounding the opposition of the deal, then so be it.

The problem is exactly what you said, people don't understand it or get it. So, they say the deal is bad because Obama is bad. The details do not matter, which is insane.

Here is Brent Scrowcroft (not a liberal.....) saying support the damn deal.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-iran-deal-an-epochal-moment/2015/08/21/c9c870b4-480f-11e5-8e7d-9c033e6745d8_story.html

Here is the thing people just cannot seem to understand.....
Let us be clear: There is no credible alternative were Congress to prevent U.S. participation in the nuclear deal. If we walk away, we walk away alone. The world’s leading powers worked together effectively because of U.S. leadership. To turn our back on this accomplishment would be an abdication of the United States’ unique role and responsibility, incurring justified dismay among our allies and friends. We would lose all leverage over Iran’s nuclear activities. The international sanctions regime would dissolve. And no member of Congress should be under the illusion that another U.S. invasion of the Middle East would be helpful.
We walk away, there is NO BETTER DEAL.
All the opposition to the deal is false, wrong, stupid, misinformed and extremely naive.
Aug 22, 2015 10:52am
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Aug 22, 2015 10:56 AM
ptown_trojans_1;1746711 wrote:If I am smug because I cannot stand the amount of stupidity surrounding the opposition of the deal, then so be it.

The problem is exactly what you said, people don't understand it or get it. So, they say the deal is bad because Obama is bad. The details do not matter, which is insane.

Here is Brent Scrowcroft (not a liberal.....) saying support the damn deal.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-iran-deal-an-epochal-moment/2015/08/21/c9c870b4-480f-11e5-8e7d-9c033e6745d8_story.html

Here is the thing people just cannot seem to understand.....



We walk away, there is NO BETTER DEAL.
All the opposition to the deal is false, wrong, stupid, misinformed and extremely naive.
That quote just tells me they should have never made a deal to begin with.
Aug 22, 2015 10:56am
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Aug 22, 2015 10:58 AM
Also you just dissed secret service agents who put their lives on the line for pieces of shit like Hillary. Don't come in here throwing around stupidity statements when you look equally as ignorant and dumb.
Aug 22, 2015 10:58am
Spock's avatar

Spock

Senior Member

2,853 posts
Aug 22, 2015 12:00 PM
ptown_trojans_1;1746711 wrote:If I am smug because I cannot stand the amount of stupidity surrounding the opposition of the deal, then so be it.

The problem is exactly what you said, people don't understand it or get it. So, they say the deal is bad because Obama is bad. The details do not matter, which is insane.

Here is Brent Scrowcroft (not a liberal.....) saying support the damn deal.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-iran-deal-an-epochal-moment/2015/08/21/c9c870b4-480f-11e5-8e7d-9c033e6745d8_story.html

Here is the thing people just cannot seem to understand.....



We walk away, there is NO BETTER DEAL.
All the opposition to the deal is false, wrong, stupid, misinformed and extremely naive.
LOL at walking away alone. THat is the fundamental flaw with this paper administration we have. No spine to be the big dog in the room. Every single country in that room is being sent billions of dollars from the US to their countries. You first use that leverage and when we walk, they all walk. Not hard.
Aug 22, 2015 12:00pm
S

superman

Senior Member

3,582 posts
Aug 22, 2015 12:43 PM
ptown_trojans_1;1746711 wrote: All the opposition to the deal is false, wrong, stupid, misinformed and extremely naive.
There's the liberal attitude. If you disagree, you're stupid.
Aug 22, 2015 12:43pm
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Aug 25, 2015 2:13 PM
IRS ADMITS to a federal court there was a second personal email account — set up under the name 'Toby Miles' — that Lois Lerner, the official at the heart of the Tea Party targeting scandal, used to conduct agency business.



She retired and draws a taxpayer-paid pension.

Change we can believe in ...
Aug 25, 2015 2:13pm
Dr Winston O'Boogie's avatar

Dr Winston O'Boogie

Senior Member

1,799 posts
Aug 25, 2015 2:54 PM
QuakerOats;1747090 wrote:IRS ADMITS to a federal court there was a second personal email account — set up under the name 'Toby Miles' — that Lois Lerner, the official at the heart of the Tea Party targeting scandal, used to conduct agency business.



She retired and draws a taxpayer-paid pension.

Change we can believe in ...
Aug 25, 2015 2:54pm
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Aug 31, 2015 11:58 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTpLS9Us4yI


Black sheriff says obama (and Holder) started the open season on police. He nailed it.
Aug 31, 2015 11:58am
IggyPride00's avatar

IggyPride00

Senior Member

6,482 posts
Aug 31, 2015 12:09 PM
BHO slapped every Ohioan in the face today by stripping Mt. McKinley of it's name in order to appease some native Americans.

71% of the country thinks we're on the wrong track and this guy is worried about renaming mountains. Pretty much sums up his entire presidency.
Aug 31, 2015 12:09pm
Heretic's avatar

Heretic

Son of the Sun

18,820 posts
Aug 31, 2015 12:40 PM
IggyPride00;1747888 wrote:BHO slapped every Ohioan in the face today by stripping Mt. McKinley of it's name in order to appease some native Americans.

71% of the country thinks we're on the wrong track and this guy is worried about renaming mountains. Pretty much sums up his entire presidency.
I somehow don't feel slapped in the face. Probably because (a) IDGAF what the mountain is named, (b) IDGAF about McKinley and haven't seen the days of school when we had to memorize all the presidents' names and (c) I'm not a dedicated drama queen like you.
Aug 31, 2015 12:40pm
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Aug 31, 2015 2:50 PM
^^ no surprise; you are essentially a non-entity.
Aug 31, 2015 2:50pm