Hb31187;1185385 wrote:Name 5 better power forwards.
1. Malone.
now name 2-5
Robert horry. Has more rings!!
/skyhook'd
And no I don't really think that.
Hb31187;1185385 wrote:Name 5 better power forwards.
1. Malone.
now name 2-5
Big Shot Bob!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Midstate01;1185405 wrote:Robert horry. Has more rings!!
/skyhook'd
And no I don't really think that.
lolMidstate01;1185405 wrote:Robert horry. Has more rings!!
/skyhook'd
And no I don't really think that.
robj55;1185401 wrote:I didn't, I was saying that would be a more sensible discussion.
Lebron couldn't end up being better than Kobe?wildcats20;1185403 wrote:No it wouldn't.
stalkerCrimson streak;1185409 wrote:Lol
See what happened when MJ retired.robj55;1185406 wrote:I know this is crazy but I would put Rodman up near the top 5 too. One of the best defenders ever and the best rebounder I've ever seen hands down.
robj55;1185410 wrote:Lebron couldn't end up being better than Kobe?
If you want to talk about guys who are this HIGH on the all time players list, you HAVE to consider rings. And Bron will not end up with more than 5.robj55;1185410 wrote:Lebron couldn't end up being better than Kobe?
robj55;1185412 wrote:stalker
Wally Sczerbiak was an all star as well and a damn good player in those days. Sam Cassell was nice and a huge shot maker. They also had great role players like Trenton Hassell and the mayor Fred Hoiberg. Oh and Sprewell was a beast then too. They had more talent than those Cavs teams hands down come to think of it so Wildcat is wrong.karen lotz;1185399 wrote:Starbury >>>>>>>>>>> any teammate LeBron had in Cleveland.
No. No. No. Dude had zero offensive game.robj55;1185406 wrote:I know this is crazy but I would put Rodman up near the top 5 too. One of the best defenders ever and the best rebounder I've ever seen hands down.
My god. You're approaching Skyhook/SQ levels. Take a step back.robj55;1185410 wrote:Lebron couldn't end up being better than Kobe?
I would probably agree about the rings, but he could still be a better player right? I said could because that is not for certain.wildcats20;1185415 wrote:If you want to talk about guys who are this HIGH on the all time players list, you HAVE to consider rings. And Bron will not end up with more than 5.
wildcats20;1185415 wrote:If you want to talk about guys who are this HIGH on the all time players list, you HAVE to consider rings. And Bron will not end up with more than 5.
I realize that but he was dominant in every other facet.chicago510;1185421 wrote:No. No. No. Dude had zero offensive game.
only when the rings argument works in their favorkaren lotz;1185424 wrote:but you have Malone as the #2 PF of all time?
All time doesn't take into consideration position....karen lotz;1185424 wrote:but you have Malone as the #2 PF of all time?