Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems
Log In Create Account

2012 NFL Random Chatter

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ 2012 NFL Random Chatter
Iliketurtles's avatar

Iliketurtles

Senior Member

8,191 posts
Mar 19, 2012 11:56 AM
Manning to the Broncos! Crazy.. Bye bye Tebow!!
Mar 19, 2012 11:56am
shook_17's avatar

shook_17

Senior Member

3,023 posts
Mar 19, 2012 7:24 PM
gronk gettin em when they are young. get it done! :thumbup:
Mar 19, 2012 7:24pm
Mr Miyagi's avatar

Mr Miyagi

wax on, wax off

1,211 posts
Mar 20, 2012 3:17 PM
NFL Network reporting that 5 teams have inquired about Tebow , one of them being the Patriots
Mar 20, 2012 3:17pm
shook_17's avatar

shook_17

Senior Member

3,023 posts
Mar 20, 2012 4:05 PM
^^ seen something on pro football talk that the jets have inquired about him and talking trade cromartie for tebow straight up.
Mar 20, 2012 4:05pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Mar 20, 2012 7:19 PM
Damn...

John McClain ‏ @
McClain_on_NFL

Texans are trading MLB DeMeco Ryans to Eagles for undisclosed draft
choice. The trade is contingent on Ryans' passing a physical Wednesday
Mar 20, 2012 7:19pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Mar 20, 2012 7:24 PM
BR1986FB;1122441 wrote:Damn...

John McClain ‏ @
McClain_on_NFL
Texans are trading MLB DeMeco Ryans to Eagles for undisclosed draft
choice. The trade is contingent on Ryans' passing a physical Wednesday
Why???
Mar 20, 2012 7:24pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Mar 20, 2012 7:28 PM
like_that;1122443 wrote:Why???


Iggles need LB's. When Casey Matthews is starting, you have issues.
Mar 20, 2012 7:28pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Mar 20, 2012 7:29 PM
BR1986FB;1122445 wrote:Iggles need LB's. When Casey Matthews is starting, you have issues.
Yeah I know that, im just wondering why the Texans would want to trade away a big piece of their defense. Mario is already gone.
Mar 20, 2012 7:29pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Mar 20, 2012 7:31 PM
like_that;1122446 wrote:Yeah I know that, im just wondering why the Texans would want to trade away a big piece of their defense. Mario is already gone.
Probably got a nice offer.

EDIT: I stand corrected...only a mid-rounder but Ryans no longer fits their 3-4 scheme. He's a tackling machine as a 4-3 MLB.
Mar 20, 2012 7:31pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Mar 20, 2012 7:47 PM
BR1986FB;1122447 wrote:Probably got a nice offer.

EDIT: I stand corrected...only a mid-rounder but Ryans no longer fits their 3-4 scheme. He's a tackling machine as a 4-3 MLB.
Well fuck, I would have taken him in a heart beat for a mid-rounder. Are the Texans kidding me? They wouldn't part ways with their backup RB unless it was a 2nd rd pick, but they are going to give up Ryans for a mid rounder?
Mar 20, 2012 7:47pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Mar 20, 2012 7:55 PM
I would have gladly given up a 3rd for Ryans.
Mar 20, 2012 7:55pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Mar 20, 2012 7:59 PM
4th rounder...believe they also swapped 2012 3rd's in the deal.
Mar 20, 2012 7:59pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Mar 20, 2012 8:01 PM
BR1986FB;1122465 wrote:4th rounder...believe they also swapped 2012 3rd's in the deal.
That's insane.
Mar 20, 2012 8:01pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Mar 20, 2012 8:05 PM
like_that;1122457 wrote: They wouldn't part ways with their backup RB unless it was a 2nd rd pick, but they are going to give up Ryans for a mid rounder?
The difference is that Tate was still in their plans, Ryans wasn't.
Mar 20, 2012 8:05pm
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Mar 20, 2012 8:11 PM
I remember when the Browns wanted Ryans, and he was snapped up one pick before the spot we traded to. We "settled" for DQ. I remember being pissed at that time, guess it worked out resonably well.
Mar 20, 2012 8:11pm
Mr Miyagi's avatar

Mr Miyagi

wax on, wax off

1,211 posts
Mar 20, 2012 9:21 PM
If Tim Tebow does not sign with another team, he will be eligible for the Hall of Fame in 5 years, 1st year eligble , and in....shouldn't be a problem

/skyhook
Mar 20, 2012 9:21pm
Skyhook79's avatar

Skyhook79

Senior Member

5,739 posts
Mar 20, 2012 9:40 PM
Mr Miyagi;1122518 wrote:If Tim Tebow does not sign with another team, he will be eligible for the Hall of Fame in 5 years, 1st year eligble , and in....shouldn't be a problem

/skyhook
Not surprised you had to edit that and it's /skyhook'd. :rolleyes:
Mar 20, 2012 9:40pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Mar 20, 2012 9:54 PM
His .500 playoff record is better than Peyton Mannings!!!
Mar 20, 2012 9:54pm
Skyhook79's avatar

Skyhook79

Senior Member

5,739 posts
Mar 20, 2012 9:57 PM
SportsAndLady;1122549 wrote:His .500 playoff record is better than Peyton Mannings!!!
Fact.

9-10 is awful for one the "all time greats"
Mar 20, 2012 9:57pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Mar 20, 2012 10:06 PM
Skyhook79;1122552 wrote:Fact.

9-10 is awful for one the "all time greats"
Serious question. When did the 1st round bye come into play? Because I assume some older guys got a game they "should win" in their careers. Obviously its not a guarantee in the NFL. But if he played in the older days without the bye, he has a much more respectable record, imo.
Mar 20, 2012 10:06pm
Skyhook79's avatar

Skyhook79

Senior Member

5,739 posts
Mar 20, 2012 10:19 PM
Laley23;1122557 wrote:Serious question. When did the 1st round bye come into play? Because I assume some older guys got a game they "should win" in their careers. Obviously its not a guarantee in the NFL. But if he played in the older days without the bye, he has a much more respectable record, imo.
The Colts had a bye 4 times in Mannings 14 years there. He won his only Super Bowl as a Wild Card. The bye has been around for a while at least 30 years I believe.
Mar 20, 2012 10:19pm
shook_17's avatar

shook_17

Senior Member

3,023 posts
Mar 20, 2012 10:21 PM
Mr Miyagi;1122518 wrote:If Tim Tebow does not sign with another team, he will be eligible for the Hall of Fame in 5 years, 1st year eligble , and in....shouldn't be a problem

/skyhook
haha. that made me lol
Mar 20, 2012 10:21pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Mar 20, 2012 10:47 PM
Skyhook79;1122552 wrote:Fact.

9-10 is awful for one the "all time greats"
19 playoff games for peyton as a starter

2 for tebow as a starter

how's tebow's cum taste?
Mar 20, 2012 10:47pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Mar 20, 2012 11:00 PM
10 playoff loses is actually an impressive stat...with 1 SB win, that's 11 postseasons. Impressive.

Not to mention you're averaging almost 1 win in those postseasons, so you're actually averaging the AFCCG when you go to the playoffs. Not bad.

But yeah, 1-1 is definitely better.
Mar 20, 2012 11:00pm