QuakerOats;931238 wrote:Ty --- you continue to throw up on yourself. Any repub - even the generic one - beats obama. The only question that exists is whether the repub will actually be running against obama!

Ty Webb;931261 wrote:Might want to check your numbers Quaker.....Romney is tied with him and no one else comes within 6 points of the President

Ty Webb;931261 wrote:Might want to check your numbers Quaker.....Romney is tied with him and no one else comes within 6 points of the President

Ty Webb;931261 wrote:Might want to check your numbers Quaker.....Romney is tied with him and no one else comes within 6 points of the President

Writerbuckeye;931264 wrote:With Christie's endorsement, I think Romney has now overtaken whatever momentum Perry had in the beginning. I think a Romney-Christie or Romney-Cain ticket might be just great. And if Christie doesn't want to be on the ticket, put him in a very visible, powerful role within the new government -- like head of Treasury.

bigdaddy2003;931504 wrote:I keep hearing how Newt isn't electable because he has "baggage." The only thing I could think of that could be considered baggage is the women situation. Does anyone have a better reason than that of why he isn't doing better?

majorspark;931508 wrote:http://youtu.be/qi6n_-wB154

[URL]http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/16/us/politics/16gingrich.html
[/URL]

QuakerOats;931373 wrote:Even the generic repub wins. Might want to find a new dem candidate.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/generic_presidential_ballot/election_2012_generic_presidential_ballot

Ty Webb;931567 wrote:Your link also show Perry beating Mitt Romney for the nomination too....shows how reliable Rasmussen is

Also,I've heard it said that it is quite easy for a "generic" canidate to beat someone....it's much harder for a named canidate to beat a President...which is why the President continues to beat Republican candidates in head-to-heads

fish82;931289 wrote:You continue to keep looking at the wrong numbers. With 6 candidates, support is spread out in varying degrees and intensity between them, making the head to heads pretty meaningless. The best indicator is Bam's ratings in the swing states....and on that front he's currently in a world of hurt.

bases_loaded;931573 wrote:Look at my link fucktard

Ty Webb;931575 wrote:He's leading in Ohio,Iowa,Pennsylvinia,Virginia,Nevada,and Florida. I think he'll be fine

QuakerOats;931580 wrote:Cain, Perry and Romney all beat obama today. He would be better off retiring to the golf course, and we would all be better for it.

fish82;931582 wrote:Leading what? His approval ratings are well under 50% in almost every state you mentioned.

Ty Webb;931585 wrote:Isn't it funny.....he still leads in head-to-heads in every state

Ty Webb;931585 wrote:Isn't it funny.....he still leads in head-to-heads in every state

fish82;931582 wrote:Leading what? His approval ratings are well under 50% in almost every state you mentioned.

I Wear Pants;931659 wrote:Approval ratings don't really carry over to election numbers. If I remember Bush had pretty damn low approval ratings and got reelected.

I Wear Pants;931674 wrote:

O-Trap;931794 wrote:Where's Perry? He's as easy a target as most of them.

Also, for what it's worth, Paul also thinks same sex couples adopting is a state issue. He voted against it in DC (on the "District" level), but he's also said that it shouldn't be legislated across the board at the Federal level.

Just FYI.