believer;655599 wrote:I agree. The difference here is I was forced by law to participate in the ponzi scheme. Normally I wouldn't recommend it.
Thats what makes it even worse then your typical ponzi scheme.
believer;655599 wrote:I agree. The difference here is I was forced by law to participate in the ponzi scheme. Normally I wouldn't recommend it.
Well if we can't trust the benevolence of Uncle Sugar who can we trust?majorspark;655601 wrote:Thats what makes it even worse then your typical ponzi scheme.
majorspark;655601 wrote:Thats what makes it even worse then your typical ponzi scheme.
believer;655604 wrote:Well if we can't trust the benevolence of Uncle Sugar who can we trust?
Well said and precisely my point.BGFalcons82;655608 wrote:Interesting points above, but I didn't see too much about the more insidious thievery going on....the IOU's written by the feds to the Social Security folks as they steal the "trust fund" money to pay for their statism without going to the people and asking for it the old fashioned way...via a tax increase. It's a hidden secret that the fuel for the runaway government spending is a tax that was already instilled by the king of the Progressives, FDR. Now, the Ponzi Scheme is coming home to roost and the theives are like cockroaches running away from the sunlight of truth. Now, the system that WAS funded is now going broke because the foxes were guarding the henhouse. We reap what we sow and for most of us, believer, we will feel the gouging that the theives spawned. Where's my pitchfork....
No - You have it all wrong. With SS, Medicare, and now ObamaKare, Uncle Sam will take good care of his children.majorspark;655624 wrote:Ourselves.
majorspark;655624 wrote:Ourselves.
That's correct because the dismantling of these public entitlements would be an admission of federal failure. And there are plenty of politicians on both sides of the aisle who don't want to admit that not to mention tens of millions of Americans who are expecting a return on their involuntary federally mandated retirement investments. A political and social nightmare of the worst kind.BGFalcons82;655628 wrote:Isn't that what our founders envisioned?
That which makes us different from all the other countries makes us the best. We should endeavor for freedom and self reliance and away from dependence and entitlements. I never see this happening without a fight.
Herein lies the problem. I fully understand and can relate that you want YOUR money back, as would everyone who was forced to pay into this ridiculous entitlement. The problem is, and what will eventually happen is, the younger generation will be paying into the system, and the older generation will be getting substantially less than what they earned. Both younger and older generations are going to have to give, not just one, but both, so sorry, I don't expect you will get "your money back".You're damned right I expect my money back.
Yes...SS is a a ridiculous entitlement but it's been thrust upon us. Trust me on this...it's here and it's here to stay in one form or another. It may not be called Social Security 15 or 20 years from now but it will be here nonetheless. That's the problem with entitlements...once they're here they're here to stay.sleeper;655664 wrote:Herein lies the problem. I fully understand and can relate that you want YOUR money back, as would everyone who was forced to pay into this ridiculous entitlement. The problem is, and what will eventually happen is, the younger generation will be paying into the system, and the older generation will be getting substantially less than what they earned. Both younger and older generations are going to have to give, not just one, but both, so sorry, I don't expect you will get "your money back".
Because us boomers were hard working bitches for the previous generation of bitches. It's the way of things in these Untied Socialist States of Amerika.Footwedge;655714 wrote:Work hard bitches....us boomers are gonna play a ton a golf and smoke big fat Havannas....all off the government teat!!!
Because us boomers were hard working bitches for the previous generation of bitches. It's the way of things in these Untied Socialist States of Amerika.Footwedge;655714 wrote:Work hard bitches....us boomers are gonna play a ton a golf and smoke big fat Havannas....all off the government teat!!!
Then you all are going to have problems. The unemployment isn't going to get better anytime soon. There aren't going to be enough people working to support those on SS.believer;655730 wrote:Yes...SS is a a ridiculous entitlement but it's been thrust upon us. Trust me on this...it's here and it's here to stay in one form or another. It may not be called Social Security 15 or 20 years from now but it will be here nonetheless. That's the problem with entitlements...once they're here they're here to stay.
This is EXACTLY why I and millions of other Americans were so friggin angry with the implementation of ObamaKare. The idiots in DC knew full well that Social Security was in trouble yet forced this new entitlement upon us in the midst of that failure. The fact that ObamaKare passed tells me all I need to know about Social Security.
All of this is just financial hocus pocus and voodoo magic when push comes to shove. Every time we collect a paycheck it's nothing more than placing value and faith in each other. Economics is a bizarre and nebulous activity. The value and faith we place in each other is only valid if we say it is.
There's always plenty of economic voodoo to go around. Social Security is a prime example. Buy hook or crook, national bankruptcy, Chinese generosity, or Obamanomics I still plan to collect my money.
Because us boomers were hard working bitches for the previous generation of bitches. It's the way of things in these Untied Socialist States of Amerika.
Simple fix...we'll just spend another $800 billion in Porkulus the Next Generation to stimulate employment. That worked well the first time around.tk421;655739 wrote:Then you all are going to have problems. The unemployment isn't going to get better anytime soon. There aren't going to be enough people working to support those on SS.
Fixed for accuracy. Per President Obamabeliever;655748 wrote:Simple fix...we'll just spend another $800 billion INVESTING in the Next Generation to stimulate employment. That worked well the first time around.
They can start by increasing the maximum investment allowed yearly in IRA's and Roth IRA's.believer;654942 wrote:
I'll agree that we need to ween ourselves off the SS system, but this should be a gradual adjustment over the next few decades. As this occurs the Feds and state governments should provide tax shelters and incentives for younger generations entering the workforce to encourage private retirement investments and savings to help offset the gradual phasing-out of SS.
fan_from_texas;655126 wrote:Exactly, exactly, exactly.
What pisses me off is when the Boomers start talking about fiscal prudence now, though by fiscal prudence they mean "Don't touch anything that helps us, like SS, but cut away at things that only help younger people, like Education." Boomers seem intent on screwing everyone else and ruining future generations.
believer;655599 wrote:I agree. The difference here is I was forced by law to participate in the ponzi scheme. Normally I wouldn't recommend it.
Listen folks, I'm opposed to government entitlements for this very reason. If my SS dollars had been applied to my own private savings, investments, or even if I simply chose to blow it out my ass it would have been my choice with my money. Even with my 401K I can option to take out a loan against it if I'm in financial need, etc. But Social Security. Nope...not allowed to touch it until I'm 65 and a half.
Like I've said...it's my money and I expect the Feds to make good....period.
HitsRus;657078 wrote: 1) raise the retirement age to reflect increasing life expectancies
2) roll back benefits to those who have not contributed any significant amount to the system.
3)find alternate means of helping fund the system...such as a phased in 25 -50 cents tax on gasoline...offset by a slight decrease in the payroll tax.
4) expanded tax advantage/amounts for IRA's and 401(K)'s
5) provide incentives for healthy people of retirement age to continue working and not draw on the system....such as reduced tax rates.
Uh huh, ungrateful.HitsRus;657109 wrote:Although not actually part of the SS 'trust fund" I'm talking about SSI. Also increasing the length of time for full vestiture. I'm talking about securing the full benefits of those who work a full life. I'm talking about making it easier for young people to acculmulate larger private Individual retirement Accounts.
What makes you think that a system so large and pendulous is not going to be subject to revision and tweaking over a perioid of time????
You are just starting your career?...hell, you got 35 years or more to save/plan for retirement. Your mom and dad have a couple maybe none. Ungrateful little whelp
Periods of economic upheaval happen. Comparitively, we've had a long run of relatively good times. Your generation has never known serious recession until now....which means in a figurative sense, you have grown up with a silver spoon in your mouth. Try dealling with inflation of 12- 14% and high unemployment.... then you'll know hard times. I don't think any generation has a magic formula...I'm sure you'll fuck it up too.No one in my generation is qualified to even run for President yet. Not our fault the country is in such a mess.