ytownfootball;474278 wrote:Earth to 58, IT'S A FUCKING TOURNAMENT1
Haha and the college football regular season isn't?
ytownfootball;474278 wrote:Earth to 58, IT'S A FUCKING TOURNAMENT1
Ty Webb;474259 wrote:My hate is totally justified when all I've heard my entire life is "If you don't like Ohio State,move out of Ohio", "Ohio State is the most storied program in the country(which they arent)"
It gets sickening
Whatever you say, Sport.Ty Webb;474277 wrote:Kinda like Ohio State most years
Hb31187;474282 wrote:They play 2 tough games and then cupcakes....Kinda sounds like what USC did for a few years in a row in the Pac10, but nobody complained about that.
ytownfootball;474288 wrote:Don't make me post picture of you gibby.


Classyposter58;474269 wrote:Haha everyone needs to shut up about Boise not being worthy. Of course they are. I mean Butler played nobody in basketball worth a shit in the HORIZON league yet they wound up running to a national title and Memphis a few years back ran through the worst the C-USA had ever been but still almost had the national championship. I don't care if they don't play a Big 10 schedule, fact is they just put together a great last minute drive against a team who has a great shot of going 11-1 in a major conference and they did while the crowd was basically all Hokie fans
Hb31187;474303 wrote:Nevada, Fresno St, Oregon St and Va Tech is as good or better than any 4 opponents USC played in a title year, from what I remember. I may have to look up who they played those years
Hb31187;474303 wrote:Nevada, Fresno St, Oregon St and Va Tech is as good or better than any 4 opponents USC played in a title year, from what I remember. I may have to look up who they played those years
ohiotiger33;474186 wrote:That late hit call was just awful. Dude was still running down the sideline-- no way the VT guy could see if he had stepped out, and the whistle was late. Wow.
Hb31187;474303 wrote:Nevada, Fresno St, Oregon St and Va Tech is as good or better than any 4 opponents USC played in a title year, from what I remember. I may have to look up who they played those years
Ty Webb;474299 wrote:
Did it for ya pal...now on to your next lame insult
I am not familiar with the system, but I get an idea of what you are saying. I guess I see it like this. We the know the schedules in advance, so if we are going to factor in strength of schedule, they should do it at the beginning of they year and make any adjustments as needed. If you put Boise State at 3rd, you shouldn't be able to come back at the end of the season and say that while Boise State is undefeated, but so is Florida so we are going to put them in the final game instead.enigmaax;474253 wrote:Just curious as to how you feel about the Ohio High School playoff system (are you familiar with it). Boise State could deserve a high ranking now. But by the end of the season, when you evaluate THE ENTIRE SEASON, there could very easily be a number of teams with better wins and more of them. And that is what will count.
There will still be a pecking order and Boise State will fall below any BCS/AQ conference team who is undefeated and will probably not end up ahead of any one loss team from the SEC and probably not the Big Ten, Big XII, or even Pac 10.
trep14;474307 wrote:And to think, Butler and Memphis were able to do that without "the grind of playing in a tough conference"...
Tiger2003;474284 wrote:ty webb.....knows nothing about College Football
like_that;474325 wrote:He knows nothing about anything he talks about.
trep14;474314 wrote:Not Fresno State, according to Enigmaax. Even though they lost by 8 to a 1-loss Cincy on the road and lost by 3 in OT to a 3 loss Wisky team on the road last year, they are absolute garbage and would get blown out by a team like Texas Tech, who would waltz to a WAC championship with their scout team.
Mooney44Cards;474320 wrote:Or because of it? How fair would a playoff be with teams like OSU, Alabama, Florida, Texas, etc getting beat up during conference play meanwhile Boise State rests their starters for 4 weeks because they cruise into the playoff picture after 5-6 weeks.
I never understood how playoffs are any more or less "fair" than any other system of crowning a championship short of throwing a dart at a wall full of names.
Hb31187;474303 wrote:Nevada, Fresno St, Oregon St and Va Tech is as good or better than any 4 opponents USC played in a title year, from what I remember. I may have to look up who they played those years
redfalcon;474317 wrote:I am not familiar with the system, but I get an idea of what you are saying. I guess I see it like this. We the know the schedules in advance, so if we are going to factor in strength of schedule, they should do it at the beginning of they year and make any adjustments as needed. If you put Boise State at 3rd, you shouldn't be able to come back at the end of the season and say that while Boise State is undefeated, but so is Florida so we are going to put them in the final game instead.
enigmaax;474328 wrote:Oh yeah, my bad on Fresno State, A team that also lost 52-14 to Nevada - who happened to lose 35-0 to Notre Dame and 45-10 to SMU and also to 3-win Colorado State. I mean, that loss to Wyoming - a team who lost 6 games by almost 30 points a game, including being shut out by 3-win Colorado - really convinced me that they are a tremendous team.
redfalcon;474339 wrote:You should evaluate the results after the games are played, but by wins and losses. If both teams win and look good doing it, its kind of hard to justify having one team suddenly jump the other.