posted by SportsAndLady
posted by iclfan2
posted by SportsAndLady
I read some attorney in Missouri tweeting about how there will 100% be charges against the woman at some point. Basically saying she can’t just go up protestors with a gun and point it at them, because they didn’t constitute a real threat.
I heard the man and woman are actually attorneys too and could be in some trouble if they get charged.
They’re multi millionaire attorneys themselves. The protestors were on a private street, which means they were trespassing, and when they told them that they threatened them. Just saw this article, and if he’s telling the truth he won’t be getting charged with anything. Where does that attorney get off saying “they didn’t constitute a real threat”? Still pretending the protestors are all peaceful?
https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/local/interview-man-with-rifle-during-st-louis-protest/63-eeb61c07-4adc-4df0-a7d0-000d40a89e78
Lol wtf did you just send? “The only thing stopping them was my gun!” That’s the most white trash Missouri trash statement ever. Stop them from what? Did the protestors destroy the other houses on the block? Did they assault their neighbors? (The answer is no). The only threat constituted was from the inbred couple.
Should the protestors have gone onto their property? No, of course not. Should the hilljack couple have gone outside with guns pointing them in the faces of the protestors? No. Both those statements can be true at the same time. Everyone in this situation was in the wrong
NONONONONONONON.....you dont get it both ways. Did they destroy anything? No because they were met with a gun. Was there assaults? No because they were stopped.
If those 2 didnt come out there, that neighborhood would have been tore up, spray paint everywhere, fires etc.... these protesters track record would indicate a 100% chance of it.
Calling them "hilljacks" or "inbreds"...GTFOH. Millionaires with guns.....whats the matter? Cant handle that? Did you only think rednecks had guns?