posted by O-Trap
Also, I must misunderstand what you're meaning when you say, "The executive can tell the judicial to pound sand and they can do nothing about it." Were that true, the relationship between the two would not be that of co-equals. It would be that of a hierarchy, with the Executive Branch being above the Judiciary Branch. Unless you mean something different than how I'm reading that, which is certainly possible. It is late.
Yes you misunderstand but its not cause its late. It is not possible to make a point in full context in just a few sentences.
Can the Judicial order federal law enforcement to arrest the POTUS and other members of the executive for what they perceive as noncompliance with their ruling? That is all I am saying.
Should the executive be forced to execute law it believes is direct violation of the Constitution? Or not execute an order it believes it has the Constitutional authority to exercise? The legislature has the Constitutional authority to remove members of other branches from office so they have the power to settle it.
But I am just making a point in futility because the leaders of all three branches mostly care about foisting their political will nationally. They parse the Constitution to fit their agenda. That said that piece of paper has been very effective in stifling the inevitable progression of government to trample the rights of the individual.