posted by like_that
There is A LOT of damning shit in that report. Ptown is downplaying a lot of it. Other than the fact that high ranking Government officials seem to always get away with shit, I can't see how the IG concluded there was no political bias. Based on what I have read:
-The DOJ changed the law to exonerate Hillary. That's where the bullshit "intent" came from Comey.
- Comey used a private server. Connecting the dots, did comey pull the "intent" out of his ass to cover his own ass if it ever came out that he used a private server?
- They prioritized the Russia investigation above Hillary's because they thought Hillary was going to win.
- Numerous agents were exchanging anti-trump and pro-hillary texts DURING these investigations.
- As mentioned by ICL, the FBI was leaking shit and they were leaking shit for favors.
-Addtional news today out of the IG suggesting Obama used an alias to email hillary on her private server.
I don't know how you can read that and say there was no political bias. We all know deep down if this was the other way around it would be covered much worse and the actors would also be in bigger trouble. The IG report is pretty much pulling a Comey. "Yeah it's illegal/bias/etc BUT..."
By the way in separate documents from the house committee reveal Hillary's foreign actors gained access to hillary's emails, which some were secret. I love how Hillary is acting high and mighty on twitter about it though. This always pissed me off, because if I did an 8th less of what Hillary did I would at a minimum lose my job. The only reason Hillary got off is because of her title and status as the IG report pretty much states.
My favorite part about this report is people see this and yet they still think DUMB Trump somehow played 4D chess and influenced the election with Russia. Is Trump a dumbass or is he a mad genius playing 4D chess against everyone else?
That bolded part is just one of those weird things people do all the time politically. I mean, over the past eight years, people on this site have alternated between saying Obama and Hillary are (pick any number of these): incompetent, idiotic, weak, gutless, etc. and yet, they'll also rant about how corrupt they are and how insidiously they are subtly working to undermine America --- the sort of thing that, regardless of how negative your other traits are, you'd need to be very competent and have a lot of guts to make an honest attempt to pull off. When people don't like a poli-person, they tend to just throw every negative adjective possible at them, regardless of how contradictory half of what they're saying is to the other half. QQ's nonstop impotent rage-posts are the easiest example, but I think most, if not all of us, who post here are guilty of that to some degree.